mariew62207 - comments

SubjectHeadlineDate
In the late 90s, I saw aMemory lapse10/01/2008
"at a scoping meeting,One tiny landing zone: the Navy's big case for an OLF09/22/2008
"Many opponents say theyOne tiny landing zone: the Navy's big case for an OLF09/21/2008
This is one reason why theOne tiny landing zone: the Navy's big case for an OLF09/21/2008
Hillary Clinton's topNo comparison09/18/2008
I am from Delaware, and, IWhich vice presidential candidate is more qualified to be president should the need arise?09/12/2008
There should not be anyNorfolk's Granby High School prepares for visit by Obama09/09/2008
Good heavens!Kaine letter slams Navy's study to move warships to Mayport05/29/2008
Well, Amy, why don't you andN.C. counties order impact study of OLF to compare with Navy's05/24/2008
VB needs to condemn encrouchmentPreservation group cites proposed Navy landing field as threat05/13/2008
The ones in VB that want toNavy plans low flights over Virginia, North Carolina sites 05/12/2008
Please don't blame us in theNavy plans low flights over Virginia, North Carolina sites 05/09/2008
Hmmmm, wonder why residentsNavy plans low flights over Virginia, North Carolina sites 05/09/2008
Hmmmmmmm, hmm, let's see,Authority to appeal ruling on Chesapeake airport noise04/29/2008
Mr. Schofield, I guess IProtecting Wakefield04/27/2008
You're right about misinformationThis time, Navy aims to build consensus for landing field04/12/2008
Ok, enough with pointingHundreds drawn to celebrate ruling on OLF04/01/2008
Condemn propertyClear Fentress homes03/14/2008
Before fingers are pointedNo help for seniors02/03/2008
More knowledge neededTurn OLF burden into OLF benefit12/02/2007
does anyone understandN.C. residents speak up against landing field10/24/2007
Info for evaluation is wrongDocuments: Navy's assessment of potential OLF sites09/26/2007
Understand why no one wants OLFN.C. counties line up against Navy plans for landing fields09/21/2007